This is my first post after a long long time. Let me straightaway get down to business. I have decided to start blogging again. The dominant trend among MBA aspirants has been to blog before and during their MBA’s. Once they are back to the humdrum of regular life, blogging takes a backseat. I want my blog to break that trend. In my opinion all MBA aspirants need to know what happens after an MBA. What changes in you for the better and what changes in you for the worse. Does the grind and intellectual rigor of an MBA make you a better human being or does it only teach you to be an elitist and an opportunist.
I start with one simple story today. One of the greatest realizations in my life has been that never disregard the unconventional as silly or impractical. Disguised as unconventional is probably the next big idea. The unconventional also has this stickiness factor. Life is full of mediocrity. Conventional is the average while the unconventional is the outlier. Think about a shelf with neatly arranged books. Do you remember the books that keep formation or do you remember the one that sticks out. The unconventional is like the book that sticks out in the neatly arranged shelf of your mind.
I was reminiscing the presidency of the graduate student body at ISB. I distinctly remember the election manifestos of two candidates. One a major (RK) with the army and the other a Lt. Colonel (GR) with the army aviation core. Both soldiers and both experienced in leading men. A voter wouldn’t have discriminated one from the other based on their antecedents. I have therefore adjusted for their pre-ISB experience. The only way one seemed different from the other was through their manifestos. While RK’s manifesto was very presidential with focus on all the usual issues that term 1 MBA’s are worried about, GR’s manifesto was outrageous. He proclaimed that if he is elected president he will start a flying club at ISB. This didnt go down well with the electorate, who thought that this man is either silly or is so full of himself that he couldn’t care less for the REAL issues that students have to face. They voted RK to office with a thumping majority (figure of speech – ISB doesnt disclose vote count)
RK had an uneventful presidency even though the job market for fresh MBA’s went belly up. He was true to his word in that he conducted himself in the most presidential manner and stayed away from any major controversies. GR on the other hand managed to start a flying club at ISB. The dozen odd students who joined his flying club got simulator trained for free – courtesy GR and his army contacts – and for a very modest sum got to fly a Cessna under the watchful eyes of an instructor. Their first flight got a lot of media coverage. GR started another pet project – turning a part of the unused football ground into a mini driving range.
Now why am I writing about all this. When I look back at my ISB days what do you think I remember – not RK’s uneventful presidency but GR’s Flying Club and Golf Course. Probably I am insane but I value the flying club more than the whole of RK’s presidency. GR’s flying club was the book that stuck out. It was unconventional in conception and thorough in implementation.
I am in no way belittling RK’s presidency. He was a good president and saw us through a difficult year. But that is precisely my point. It is not enough being good. Good is average. Average doesnt stick. Good is the hygiene you need to fulfill a role. What people remember is the outrageous. I add here that it is not enough being outrageous. Outrageous ideas should be followed up with action to see the idea through. While some people are unconventional others are deliberately anti-conventional. I value the unconventional and not the anti-conventional.
A friend of mine – working at a large pharma concern- was telling me the other day how the new head of marketing was trying to apply marketing tactics used in the consumer goods industry to the pharma industry. She laughed at the thought and said that its never going to work. She was disregarding a unconventional idea and labeling it outrageous. Probably she is right. But what if she is wrong. What if this new guy shakes up the existing ways in which drugs are marketed? You cannot say for sure what will happen, but its important to give unconventional ideas the attention they deserve.
